Information » Instead of offerin

by Lu Jiafei


WASHINGTON adidas human race cz , Sept. 10 (Xinhua) -- Pentagon spokesman Peter Cook said Thursday that Defense Secretary Ash Carter has instructed his undersecretary of defense for intelligence to make clear to military officials that he expects "unvarnished, transparent" intelligence.


The demand came after allegations that quite some intelligence reports were changed to exaggerate progress against the extremist group the Islamic State (IS).


Shortly after the IS took full control of the strategically vital city of Ramadi in Iraq in May, questions were raised regarding whether the U.S. anti-IS strategy failed.


"No, I don't think we're losing," said U.S. President Barack Obama.


For a long time, the Pentagon has been telling Americans that despite occasional "tactical setbacks", the counterterrorism operations in Syria and Iraq, where the IS is still occupying vast portions of land, are making headway.


One year into the military campaign against the IS group, a cohort of U.S. intelligence analysts complained that their reports on the campaign were altered by senior officials to present a rosier picture.


Early in July, two senior analysts at the U.S. military's Central Command (CENTCOM) filed a written complaint to the U.S. Defense Department inspector general, saying that their reports on the anti-IS campaign, some of which were for Obama, played down the real significance of the threat posed by the militant group.


The complaint claimed that CENTCOM seniors, including the director of intelligence and his deputy, had whitewashed the situations on ground to fit the Obama administration's public narrative that the U.S. is winning the battle against the IS.


In an exclusive report released late Wednesday, the U.S. news website The Daily Beast said the complaint was now supported by another 50 analysts.


"The cancer was within the senior level of the intelligence command," The Daily Beast cited one defense official as saying.


Still under investigation by the Pentagon's inspector general, the allegations could remind many of previous charges around 2002 that U.S. senior officials cherry-picked intelligence about Iraq's supposed weapons program.


Calling the move by the sizeable cadre of protesting analysts a "revolt", some of those analysts reportedly said the final version "manipulated" by CENTCOM higher-ups did not accurately reflect their conclusions.


The analysts take a more pessimistic view about how military efforts to destroy the groups are going, reported the Daily Beast.


Apart from removing some key elements of intelligence reports, the complaints alleged that senior leaders at CENTCOM created "an unprofessional work environment" by forcing analysts to self-censor their reports.


For those reports regarded as too negative in the assessment of the war, they simply disappeared down the chain of command, the Daily Beast cited several analysts as saying.


"Some felt it was a product of commanders protecting their career advancement by putting the best spin on the war," the Daily Beast reported.


Related:


Full Story


Turkey, U.S. ink deal on joint military operations against IS: Turkish FM


ANKARA, Aug. 25 (Xinhua) -- Turkey and the United States have concluded "technical talks" on military operations and sealed a deal against Islamic State (IS) group, Turkish Foreign Minister Mevlut Cavusoglu said on Tuesday.Full Story


IS's second-in-command killed in U.S. air strike: White House


WASHINGTON, Aug. 21 (Xinhua) -- The White House said on Friday that Fadhil Ahmad al-Hayali, the second-in-command of the extremist group the Islamic State (IS), was killed in a U.S. air strike on Aug. 18 while travelling in a vehile near Mosul, Iraq.


by Xinhua Writer Tian Dongdong


BEIJING, Aug. 14 (Xinhua) -- By mentioning the Japanese government's previous apologies in his WWII anniversary statement Friday, Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe hopes to take a step forward toward reconciliation with his country's neighbors.


Yet given the carefully calibrated context into which he has embedded those too-fundamental-to-avoid terms, the apology was a diluted one at best, thus marking only a crippled start to build trust among its neighbors.


Closely watched both at home and abroad, Abe trod a fine line with linguistic tricks, attempting to please his rightwing base on the one hand and avoid further damage in Japan's ties with its neighbors on the other.


The watered-down statement, in essence, is a retrogression from the 1995 statement by then Prime Minister Tomiichi Murayama, which bravely and honestly admitted Japan's war past and expressed "deep remorse" and a "heartfelt apology" for its war crimes.


Instead of offering an unambiguous apology, Abe's statement is rife with rhetorical twists like "maintain our position of apology", dead giveaways of his deep-rooted historical revisionism, which has haunted Japan's neighborhood relations.


By adding that it is unnecessary for Japan's future generations to keep apologizing, Abe seemed to say that his once-for-all apology can close the page of history.